The predominant selling point behind the F-35 propaganda campaign is the proposition that it’ll be capable of a broad range of missions, from air superiority to suppression of enemy air defenses … from stealth strike to (cough, cough) close air support.
The Air Force’s effort to push the A-10 into the boneyard to accommodate the F-35’s excess budgetary girth has featured roughly the inverse logic — that the Warthog is a “single mission” platform and therefore not versatile or flexible enough to earn a spot in a shrinking future inventory.
This is, of course, total bunk. Students of airpower — at least who haven’t yet donated their brains to the cult ideology of F-35 uber alles — can enumerate at least four distinct A-10 missions: close air support, air interdiction, anti-maritime, and combat search and rescue, or “Sandy.”
It’s the Sandy mission that has been most grievously ignored by the Air Force in its proposal to retire the A-10. The mission of commanding and coordinating the recovery of downed airmen behind enemy lines is specialized. It requires low-speed maneuverability, comfort in the low-altitude environment, long loiter, close integration with rescue forces, superb cockpit visibility, and consistent practice. There’s no answer for how this mission gap will be filled if the A-10 is retired. Neither the F-35 nor legacy F-16/F-15 platforms have the right blend of capabilities to pick up this mission requirement without a significant spike in operational risk.
Unless the U.S. is ready to accept having its downed aviators captured and perhaps tortured and killed by non-state groups unlikely to obey the dictates of International Humanitarian Law, it would be reckless to divest the A-10 Sandy mission without a clearly established, proven follow-on.
The astute Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ), who flew the A-10 in combat and commanded an A-10 squadron, has said or implied as much repeatedly over the past several months. Her skilled advocacy has rallied Congress to slam the door shut on any plan to retire the A-10 before a credible follow-on is developed. A presidential veto has complicated things, but it still appears as though a materializing budget compromise will save the Air Force from itself on this issue for at least the next two years.
Hopefully, by the time the issue ripens for debate again, a new Air Force leadership team will have taken the opportunity to lucidly reflect and develop a more balanced vision of future warfare that supports the full spectrum of envisaged capabilities required for national defense.
If anyone needs a reminder of the Sandy mission in the meantime, this footage can help. It’s a vivid illustration that the A-10’s “other mission” as chief guarantor of the recovery of American aircrews from enemy territory is in good hands, and should remain there until someone has a better idea.
© 2015 Bright Mountain Media, Inc.
All rights reserved. The content of this webpage may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Bright Mountain Media, Inc. which may be contacted at email@example.com